Re: Big Bang: How widely accepted?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Cybersmith Customer: "facial differences"
• Previous message: Scott Ellis: "Re: Basque, where did they come from?"

i don't know what `pure' means below, but astronomy hasn't
`given up' on cosmology. the next generation of surveys
could give interesting limits on parameters in the standard
models.

this isn't a `finished' science. it's research, not a school
lesson. so things happen at different times. that doesn't
mean that we won't get answers - be a bit more patient.

andrew

In article <41kvdp$hpj@gap.cco.caltech.edu>,
Carl J Lydick <carl@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU> wrote:
>Perhaps because pure astronomy is inadequate to deal with cosmology?

-- 

  A.Cooke@roe.ac.uk  work phone 0131 668 8357  home phone/fax 0131 667 0208

    institute for astronomy, royal observatory, blackford hill, edinburgh

                     http://www.roe.ac.uk/ajcwww

• Next message: Cybersmith Customer: "facial differences"
• Previous message: Scott Ellis: "Re: Basque, where did they come from?"