Re: if existance exists why create a creator?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Whittet: "Re: Pyramidiocy, Facts to refute it (Long)"
• Previous message: Danny Yee: "Book Review - The Great Human Diasporas (Cavalli-Sforza)"
• Maybe in reply to: Diane_M Greene: "if existance exists why create a creator?"
• Next in thread: (no name): "Re: if existance exists why create a creator?"

Existence in Shaivite Hinduism is defined by the Brahman. Only the
Brahman truly has existence. It can neither be created nor destroyed.
What we deem creation is simply a transformation of the existing.
Thus creation assumes existence and can only function within an
existing Brahman. Something has to exist before something else is
created from it. Similarly for destruction. Something has to exist
before it is destroyed and something will continue to exist even after
destruction.

• Next message: Whittet: "Re: Pyramidiocy, Facts to refute it (Long)"
• Previous message: Danny Yee: "Book Review - The Great Human Diasporas (Cavalli-Sforza)"
• Maybe in reply to: Diane_M Greene: "if existance exists why create a creator?"
• Next in thread: (no name): "Re: if existance exists why create a creator?"