Re: THE MOST STUPID WOMEN,i.e.WHITE WOMEN,.............

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Paul F. Sagasta: "Re: Why not 13 months? (Was La Systeme Metrique)"
• Previous message: Handel Richard : "Re: THE MOST STUPID WOMEN,i.e.WHITE WOMEN,............."
• Maybe in reply to: franz glasl: "THE MOST STUPID WOMEN,i.e.WHITE WOMEN,............."
• Next in thread: L B Olson: "Re: THE MOST STUPID WOMEN,i.e.WHITE WOMEN,............."

I browse the sci.anthropology newsgroup looking for interesting "scientific"
conversations and what I find is this?

It makes me really wonder what all the noise is about concerning the beauty and
wonder of modern comminication on the internet. This conversation in particular
does not belong under a sci heading. Who "polices" this newgroup or is it just
a free for all?

This particular item is one of the worst heading I have seen, but in browsing
the other postings in this newsgroup I have most UNimpressed.

so sad...

-- 

Jenel M. Hazlett  Jenel_M._Hazlett.ccmepus.mobil.com 

Any comments or statements made are not necessarily those of Mobil Corporation,

its subsidiaries or affiliates.

• Next message: Paul F. Sagasta: "Re: Why not 13 months? (Was La Systeme Metrique)"
• Previous message: Handel Richard : "Re: THE MOST STUPID WOMEN,i.e.WHITE WOMEN,............."
• Maybe in reply to: franz glasl: "THE MOST STUPID WOMEN,i.e.WHITE WOMEN,............."
• Next in thread: L B Olson: "Re: THE MOST STUPID WOMEN,i.e.WHITE WOMEN,............."