Re: SCIENCE OFTEN MASQUERADES AS LAW (AND VICE-VERSA)

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Kathy Petrie: "Re: Gender differences"
• Previous message: Bruce D. Scott: "Re: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory""
• Maybe in reply to: Poor Richard: "SCIENCE OFTEN MASQUERADES AS LAW (AND VICE-VERSA)"

In message <3nnlv6$faf@rc1.vub.ac.be> - joan@vandijck.ulb.ac.be (Joan Pontius)
writes:
>In article <3nm1qq$epu@miwok.nbn.com>, dandrake@nbn.com (Dan Drake) writes:
>|> Remember, folks, you don't have to read this pompous third-person drivel.
>|> Your newsreader has a Kill facility buried somewhere; learn about it.
>|>
>|> Dan Drake
>|> dandrake@nbn.com
>|>
>|>
>
>
>Dan,
>
>You have a definite obsession with censorship don't you?
>
>I swear, everytime I turn around you're up on your soap box
>screaming "Don't Listen to them!"
>
>(you have something to hide?)
>
>
>
>yer pal,
>
>joan

Not at all. If you could read, you'd see I was merely reminding any people
who know more of science than of usenet that they don't _have_ to leave the
signal-to-noise ratio as high as in the unfiltered input.

Now, aren't you glad I had neglected to put you in my killfile?

Dan Drake
dandrake@nbn.com

• Next message: Kathy Petrie: "Re: Gender differences"
• Previous message: Bruce D. Scott: "Re: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory""
• Maybe in reply to: Poor Richard: "SCIENCE OFTEN MASQUERADES AS LAW (AND VICE-VERSA)"