Re: Is white racism nec. all bad?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: ralph ambrose: "Re: private practice anthro'-clinical anthro'"
• Previous message: Jeff: "software incest?"

In <3nq1o8$73l@blarg1.blarg.com> warrl@blarg.com (Donald Edwards) writes:

>"grizzy@entriprise (eileen camilleri) writes:
>">
>">: >Hitler is the world's most famous despot because the Jews were very
>">: >successful in their goal to demonize him

>So, where precisely is the anti-Semitism in this true statement?
>
>If the Jews had shut up about him at the end of the war, he would
>be virtually unheard-of today.
>
>He would still be one of history's *worst* despots, but not
>singularly famous. The facts of his despotism make it very
>easy to demonize him, but it still takes some effort to keep
>those facts in the public eye.

So you believe that Hitler would have been just a garden variety
despot if the Jews hadn't "demonized" him.

What an interesting perspective you all have. One would imagine
that the mountains of ashes and bones, the fields that stretch
far and wide, dotted with pits stacked with emaciated corpses,
the many films and photos and records compiled by the Germans
themselves, let alone the allied forces, would have provided
enough evidence to render Hitler quite unique in the view of the
world.

What you are saying, and this may be true for all I know, is that
only the Jews would care about this. Nobody else would bat an
eye.

Or perhaps you're just saying that you, personally, don't care
what happened?

--

Singer

• Next message: ralph ambrose: "Re: private practice anthro'-clinical anthro'"
• Previous message: Jeff: "software incest?"