Re: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory"
Gil Hardwick (gil@landmark.iinet.net.au)
Wed, 26 Apr 1995 04:09:47 GMT
In article <23APR199517035218@rosie.uh.edu>, JAMES BENTHALL (st26h@rosie.uh.edu) writes:
>In article <1995Apr21.143347.1@ulkyvx.louisville.edu>, jsmill01@ulkyvx.louisville.edu writes...
>>In article <D7Bp5K.J1I@crash.cts.com>, roosen@crash.cts.com (Robert Roosen) writes:
>>> OK, I'll bite. What's the difference between nature and God?
>>
>>One is a human invention?
>>
>
>Great repost! I love it!
>
Yes quite remarkable isn't it. Here we have an astronomer coming out
to proclaim Nature as a human invention, while God reigns eternal.
Or is he? Hard to tell, one way or the other . . .
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
He who refuses to qualify data is doomed to rant.
+61 97 53 3270
|