Re: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Gerold Firl: "Re: zoosexual cave art anywhere?"
• Previous message: Ken Smith: "Re: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory""

carl@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU (Carl J Lydick) wrote:
>In article <3neubb$hhl@aladdin.rotterdam.luna.net>, David Bos
<davidb@luna.nl> writes:
>=I have read something similar: about photons loosing energy on the way.
>=I suppose that would depend on photons having mass or not.How is the current

>=insight on that?
>
>The "tired light" hypothesis, so beloved of creationists, hasn't been in use
>by anybody except them since the 1950s or thereabouts.

well, the popularity of this hypothosis amongst creationists is in itself
not a reason to discard it. i am not a creationist btw.

But what about photons? Do they have mass or not?

• Next message: Gerold Firl: "Re: zoosexual cave art anywhere?"
• Previous message: Ken Smith: "Re: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory""