|
|
Re: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory"
Erik Max Francis (max@alcyone.darkside.com)
Sat, 22 Apr 95 14:04:55 PDT
schumach@convex.com (Richard A. Schumacher) writes:
> In <382@landmark.iinet.net.au> gil@landmark.iinet.net.au (Gil Hardwick) asser
>
> >To assert that such an explosion JUST HAPPENED out of nothing defies
> >everything we know about explosions. And catastrophes.
>
> But not everything we know about physics. Quantum mechanics permits
> temporary violations of the conservation laws. The visible universe
> may be one such.
Besides, calling the Big Bang an "explosion" does not do it justice,
because it wasn't anything like an explosion.
Erik Max Francis, &tSftDotIotE ...!uuwest!alcyone!max max@alcyone.darkside.com
San Jose, CA ... GIGO, Hg, Omega, Universe, Psi ... ICBM: 37 20 N 121 53 W _
H.3`S,3,P,3$S,#$Q,C`Q,3,P,3$S,#$Q,3`Q,3,P,C$Q,#(Q.#`-"C`- ftmfbs kmmfa mc2 / \
Omnia quia sunt, lumina sunt. ("All things that are, are lights.") -><- \_/
"We all may have come on different ships, but we're in the same boat now."
|