Re: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory"

Gil Hardwick (gil@landmark.iinet.net.au)
Thu, 20 Apr 1995 01:56:34 GMT


In article <3n2vf3$76k@pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu>, David Thomas (thomas@pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu) writes:
>Or a higher opinion of nature's.

God, Nature, what's the difference? Who cares whether there is a
difference anyway?

In the argument about red shifts, all we are observing are red shifts.
Here all we are observing are people arguing via an electronic medium,
invoking religious entities to suit their own self-interest.

I think it was Gilbert Keith Chesterton who defined arguing from
different premises as two housewives screaming at one another from
their respective second floor windows.

Apologies to the feminists . . .

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
He who refuses to qualify data is doomed to rant.
+61 97 53 3270