Re: Evidence for "Big Bang Theory"
Gil Hardwick (gil@landmark.iinet.net.au)
Wed, 19 Apr 1995 03:24:00 GMT
In article <wdferris.17.2F91BBAE@facstaff.wisc.edu>, Ferris (wdferris@facstaff.wisc.edu) writes:
.
.
.
>strong support for the big bang model. There are other predictions of the
>big bang which have been confirmed by observation--chief among these is the
>observation that the universe is expanding--and it is this power of
>prediction that makes the big bang the most compelling model for creation of
>the universe.
>
Surely your argument can only refer to the creation of THIS universe
we happen to be experiencing at the moment. What created the universe
in which the big bang had taken place; the catastrophe which destroyed
that one to create this one?
Further, what created the conditions for the big bang to occur in any
event?
To assert that such an explosion JUST HAPPENED out of nothing defies
everything we know about explosions. And catastrophes.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
He who refuses to qualify data is doomed to rant.
+61 97 53 3270
|