Re: zoosexual cave art anywhere?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Gil Hardwick: "Smith, Berry, et al"
• Previous message: Gil Hardwick: "Re: Religion: definition of"
• Maybe in reply to: Stephen Wray: "zoosexual cave art anywhere?"
• Next in thread: Stephen Wray: "Re: zoosexual cave art anywhere?"

In article <STEVEW.95Apr16233424@debretts.comp.vuw.ac.nz>, Stephen Wray (stevew@debretts.comp.vuw.ac.nz) writes:
>"Zoosexual" thats about the best euphemism I could think of for a rather
>frowned upon topic.
>
>I have read vague references to cave paintings of sexual acts between
>people and animals.
>
>Supposedly, such cave art is quite common -- though I have never actually
>seen any well-documented instances.
>

Don't forget to include cartoons of New Zealanders wearing wellington
boots as you consult your prehistoric Far Side, will you . . . ;-)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"NEW ACRES FARMING" RSM 89, Vasse Hwy
Whole Farm Planning Consultants YOONGARILLUP 6280
+61 97 53 3270 Western Australia

• Next message: Gil Hardwick: "Smith, Berry, et al"
• Previous message: Gil Hardwick: "Re: Religion: definition of"
• Maybe in reply to: Stephen Wray: "zoosexual cave art anywhere?"
• Next in thread: Stephen Wray: "Re: zoosexual cave art anywhere?"