Re: aquatic equus?
Holly Reeser (reeser@flmnh.ufl.edu)
Wed, 04 Sep 1996 09:37:38 -0400
Mike Munsil wrote:
>
> Anything is possible, but I believe that an Equus fossil from a
> shallow marine embayment would be more likely to have been
> deposited there by riverine processes. That is, location does
> not necessarily indicate adaptation.
>
> --
>
Obviously you missed the sarcasm! This is not a serious question. Make
the connection....who else is arguing depostional environment as
indicative of habitiat preference and aquatic adaptation? AAH. Get it
now?
|