Re: archaic Homo sapiens

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Marius Loots: "Re: Naked Ape & ATT"
• Previous message: chris brochu: "Re: AAT Theory"
• Maybe in reply to: Vincent DeLuca: "archaic Homo sapiens"

Vincent DeLuca writes:

> We are dealing with two *different* species, Homo erectus and
>Homo
>sapiens. It is a bit rare,especially in the animal kingdom, for two
>different species to have progeny eventhough they can have sex. Please
>don`t bring up the mule!

Homo erectus gave rise to Homo sapiens.
At what point do you draw the line between the two?

Because if you say that no interbreeding could have taken place between the
two species, you must have point where the offspring would not be able to
have viable offspring with the previous generation.
Groetnis
Maestro

mloots@medic.up.ac.za pgp2.6
marius.loots@spectrum.iaccess.za old.bones@leclub.co.za
Add some Chaos to your Life and put the World in Order.
First there is the Idea. Then the Idea becomes the Institution.
Then the Institution dominates. Dictates. Then there is a new Idea.

• Next message: Marius Loots: "Re: Naked Ape & ATT"
• Previous message: chris brochu: "Re: AAT Theory"
• Maybe in reply to: Vincent DeLuca: "archaic Homo sapiens"