Re: post from Holloway

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Andrew Spring: "Re: Just ignore the annoying AAT crap!"
• Previous message: Mark Winston Lowe: "Re: AAT: Closing Argument"
• Maybe in reply to: Alex Duncan: "post from Holloway"
• Next in thread: Gerrit Hanenburg: "Re: post from Holloway"

gerritha@knoware.nl (Gerrit Hanenburg) writes:

>Depends on your criteria.If snakes took their own complicated jaw structure as a
>criterion of evolutionary advancement,they would consider humans as a very lowly
>form of life.

Yeah, if snakes could think about evolution, they might think so.

If rocks could eat, would they prefer sweets or hot foods?

If fishes could read would they prefer fiction or nonfiction?

-- 



				Regards, Mark

				http://www.smns.montclair.edu/~hubey

• Next message: Andrew Spring: "Re: Just ignore the annoying AAT crap!"
• Previous message: Mark Winston Lowe: "Re: AAT: Closing Argument"
• Maybe in reply to: Alex Duncan: "post from Holloway"
• Next in thread: Gerrit Hanenburg: "Re: post from Holloway"