Re: Guide for anti-AATers

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: H. M. Hubey: "Re: The straw man."
• Previous message: Phil Nicholls: "Re: tears"
• Maybe in reply to: jamesb@hgu.mrc.ac.uk: "Guide for anti-AATers"
• Next in thread: cc3265@CNSVAX.ALBANY.EDU: "Re: Guide for anti-AATers"

jamesb@hgu.mrc.ac.uk graced us with the following words:

>cc3265@CNSVAX.ALBANY.EDU wrote:
> Headings like "So-and-so is lazy and ignorant" or "What is
>>so-and-so's point" and so on and so on . . . do not have a place in a
>>scientific forum,

>Good on you.

Please. If you thing this is atypical of scientific debates you
should make it a point when attending the next AAPA meeting to sit in
on any session involving Milford Wolpoff. Paleoanthropology is not
unique in t his regard either.

Headings of this sort are a Usenet tradition.

Phil Nicholls pnich@globalone.net
"To ask a question you must first know most of the answer"
-Robert Sheckley

• Next message: H. M. Hubey: "Re: The straw man."
• Previous message: Phil Nicholls: "Re: tears"
• Maybe in reply to: jamesb@hgu.mrc.ac.uk: "Guide for anti-AATers"
• Next in thread: cc3265@CNSVAX.ALBANY.EDU: "Re: Guide for anti-AATers"