Re: AAT: I just rediscovered... PLEASE END THREAD.

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: H. M. Hubey: "Re: Plea for restraint... was re:AAT etc."
• Previous message: Bill Burnett: "Ears under pressure. Was Re: Aquatic ape theory"

I am deeply sorry for having started this particular AAT thread precisely
complaining about how many AAT threads are here. Now I kindly, humbly request
to finish at least this one.

I plead guilty to being naive about how to lower the AAT-related
traffic. However, I should say that sci.anthropology.paleo looks better this
Monday. "Only" 26 of 53 threads (mind you) are AAT-specific or AAT-spawned. As
I do urgently need to get a life, I leave you with this beautiful and convincing
example of scientific thought (pun very much intended) originated by Mr Hubey:

In article <hubey.813786444@pegasus.montclair.edu>,
hubey@pegasus.montclair.edu (H. M. Hubey) wrote:
>
>Would you (and everyone else so inclined) please list
>in order of increasing convincibility what kinds of evidence
>one expects to "support" AAT.
>

Wow! Theories, anybody? I promise I, me!, will list the kinds of evidence that
YOU need to prove your theory.

Sorrowfully yours,

Domingo.

+++
Domingo Martinez-Castilla
agdndmc@mizzou1.missouri.edu
+++

• Next message: H. M. Hubey: "Re: Plea for restraint... was re:AAT etc."
• Previous message: Bill Burnett: "Ears under pressure. Was Re: Aquatic ape theory"