Re: Aquatic ape theory

Paul Crowley (Paul@crowleyp.demon.co.uk)
Sat, 14 Oct 95 13:16:52 GMT

In article <45n503$9e9@kira.cc.uakron.edu>
r3dlb1@dax.cc.uakron.edu "David L Burkhead " writes:

> In article <813573579snz@crowleyp.demon.co.uk> Paul@crowleyp.demon.co.uk writes:> >In article <45k627$k92@kira.cc.uakron.edu>

> >this and several other reasons, I believe that the "aquatic" period
> >lasted much longer: i.e. 5-1.5 mya.
>
> Since these species were _not_ aquatic apes, then
> a version of AAH which says they are must be discarded.

I'm really a Littoral Ape Theorist (LAT) a very watered-down (haha)
version. As far as I can see it, this only requires that hominids
>1.5mya be found in association with large bodies of water. I
could be wrong, but nearly all sites seem satisfy this requirement.

Paul.