|
|
Re: Aquatic ape theory
Elaine Morgan (Elaine@desco.demon.co.uk)
Fri, 06 Oct 1995 14:16:21 GMT
In article: <44tr0n$j45@kruuna.helsinki.fi> ronkanen@cc.Helsinki.FI
(Osmo Ronkanen) writes:
> If the body
> ----------------- restoring unmarked deletion-
---------------------------
> >>hair would have been beneficial for living in land, it should have
> >>returned. If it was harmful, then one needs no AAT to explain the
loss.
> >>I cannot think how having the hair or lack of it could have been so
> >>irrelevant that millions of years of evolution did not change it.
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Elaine Morgan
|