Re: homo erectus

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: JF Dullaart: "Re: AAT Theory"
• Previous message: Jim Foley: "Re: Australia and brains..."

In <4471vg$i0e@rebecca.albany.edu> cc3265@CNSVAX.ALBANY.EDU writes:
>
>In article <4459mv$t1i@ixnews4.ix.netcom.com>, vincent1@ix.netcom.com
(Vincent DeLuca) writes:
>>
>>>The argument going on now is whether regional groups of H. erectus
or
>>whether
>>>Neandertals in Europe evolved into H. sapiens.
>>>Caroline
>>>
>>
>> What happened to the *Out of Africa* argument?
>> Vincent1
>
>That is what I was referring to -- the multiregional argument says
that
>H.sapiens evolved from erectus regionally (and perhaps from
Neandertals in
>Europe) while the Out of Africa disagrees, maintaining that all
indigenous
>populations were replaced by new migrations of H. sapiens from Africa.

You should add: populations were replaced by new migrations of
H. sapiens from Africa *without interbreeding*.
Vincent1.

• Next message: JF Dullaart: "Re: AAT Theory"
• Previous message: Jim Foley: "Re: Australia and brains..."