Re: Breast Cancer, the Secular Trend, Testosterone, and DHEA: Originality

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Nold Egenter: "Re: Lamarckist Contradiction"
• Previous message: Stella Nemeth: "Re: A Demand for the Kennewick Man's Remains"
• Maybe in reply to: James Howard: "Breast Cancer, the Secular Trend, Testosterone, and DHEA: Originality"
• Next in thread: Phillip Bigelow: "Re: Breast Cancer, the Secular Trend, Testosterone, and DHEA: Originality"

>James Howard wrote:
>> I have attempted publication in scientific journals; all were rejected.

Phillip Bigelow <bh162@scn.org> wrote:
>Do you have any theories as to why your drafts were rejected?
>This is not an ad hominim attack; rather, it is a very legitimate
>question.

James Howard responds:
I responded to your earlier posts, because you challenged my veracity. I did
not want to let my lack of response be interpreted inappropriately. I do
consider your current post an ad hominem attack.

• Next message: Nold Egenter: "Re: Lamarckist Contradiction"
• Previous message: Stella Nemeth: "Re: A Demand for the Kennewick Man's Remains"
• Maybe in reply to: James Howard: "Breast Cancer, the Secular Trend, Testosterone, and DHEA: Originality"
• Next in thread: Phillip Bigelow: "Re: Breast Cancer, the Secular Trend, Testosterone, and DHEA: Originality"