Re: Why is Homo sapiens hairless?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Paul Crowley: "Re: An alternative to ST and AAT"
• Previous message: Rabbi Bruce Cohen: "Lamarckist Contradiction"

In article <56s00o$ebb@news.NL.net>
G.Hanenburg@inter.nl.net "Gerrit Hanenburg" writes:

> Paul@crowleyp.demon.co.uk (Paul Crowley) wrote:
>
> >You cannot put forward a wild theory with absolutely no evidence
> >and claim to be doing science.
>
> That is a wise remark Paul,but.........somehow I feel that something
> is wrong here. These words sound so strange when coming from you.

I should have watched my words more carefully. It's OK to put
forward a wild theory _as_a_wild_theory_ without much evidence
(after all there's often not much) but it's wrong to put one
forward as fact.

Paul.

• Next message: Paul Crowley: "Re: An alternative to ST and AAT"
• Previous message: Rabbi Bruce Cohen: "Lamarckist Contradiction"