Re: LUCY: ``Yes, we have no bananas!"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Paul Crowley: "Re: An alternative to ST and AAT"
• Previous message: Gerrit Hanenburg: "Re: Why is Homo sapiens hairless?"
• Maybe in reply to: Ed Conrad: "LUCY: ``Yes, we have no bananas!""
• Next in thread: Ed Conrad: "Re: LUCY: ``Yes, we have no bananas!""

Oh look - another post from Ed 'the world's greatest living
anthropologist' Conrad with no real content again. Oh goody.

Ed - doesn't the fact that *NO* anthropologists and *NO*
paleontologists agree with you maybe suggest that you are
more likely to be talking crap than they are protecting
the mythical 'party line'. If there is this so-called
'party line', why is it that many of them still disagree
on many minor and not-so-minor points?

Or are you just massaging your own sad, insignificant
little ego - trying to make your mark on the world and
getting frustrated when the world laughs in your face?

Sorry if this is an ad-hominem <sp?> attack, but I
just got so fed up with reading this crap. Okay, I
shouldn't have responded at all, but I feel better
having screamed!

--

Rich Hanson, Software Engineer, +44 (0)1634 844400 x4937

richard.hanson@gecm.com

GEC Marconi Avionics Limited, Rochester, Kent, ENGLAND

Speaking for myself, of course!

• Next message: Paul Crowley: "Re: An alternative to ST and AAT"
• Previous message: Gerrit Hanenburg: "Re: Why is Homo sapiens hairless?"
• Maybe in reply to: Ed Conrad: "LUCY: ``Yes, we have no bananas!""
• Next in thread: Ed Conrad: "Re: LUCY: ``Yes, we have no bananas!""