Re: LUCY: ``Yes, we have no bananas!"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Paul Crowley: "Re: An alternative to ST and AAT"
• Previous message: Paul Z. Myers: "Re: Skull in Boulder images"
• Maybe in reply to: Ed Conrad: "LUCY: ``Yes, we have no bananas!""
• Next in thread: Kathy McIntosh: "Re: LUCY: ``Yes, we have no bananas!""

Ed Conrad wrote:
>
> A lot of pointless nattering snipped...

As many others have commented, this really has nothing to do with
sci. archaeology. I agree that talk.origins is the place for
this thread, and only fanaticism could have forced it into newsgroups
where it has no place.

Followups set to talk.origins

-- 

Reading mail from me in this forum does not grant you

the right to send me unsolicited commercial email.  All

senders of unsolicited commercial email will be

reported to their postmasters as Usenet abusers.

• Next message: Paul Crowley: "Re: An alternative to ST and AAT"
• Previous message: Paul Z. Myers: "Re: Skull in Boulder images"
• Maybe in reply to: Ed Conrad: "LUCY: ``Yes, we have no bananas!""
• Next in thread: Kathy McIntosh: "Re: LUCY: ``Yes, we have no bananas!""