|
|
Re: LUCY: ``Yes, we have no bananas!"
Eileen D. Chapman (echapman@emeraldis.com)
Mon, 11 Nov 1996 19:20:55 -0500
We did NOT evolve from those primates(or whatever they're called)! It's
just a coincidence that we look sorta like apes. We were created by God.(
I hope that does not upset anyone!
> karen@uab.edu (karen@uab.edu) wrote in article
<567e84$6it@maze.dpo.uab.edu>...
> edconrad@prolog.net (Ed Conrad) wrote:
>
>
> >Newsgroup question:
>
> >> Is Lucy a Monkey?
>
> >Damn right it is!
> >``Lucy" is nothing more than a member of the ``monkey" family,
> >with no connection -- none whatsoever -- to early man.
>
> >The dreamers and hallucinators who led the ``expeditionary" team
> >are well aware of the fraud they had attempted to perpetrate by
> >claiming it to be a missing link.
>
> >Fact is, the few bits and pieces of what they called ``Lucy" -- to go
> >with the vast majority of manmade bonelike additions that were used to
> >fill the many gaps -- weren't even found in close proximity.
>
> >Truth is, ``Lucy" is a mosaic of a few bones that were found over a
> >square mile.
>
> >To put it rather bluntly, ``Lucy" is a mockery of scientific
> >integrity (if some still exits in the field of physical anthropology,
> >which I sort of doubt)).
>
>
> Uhm, am I on candid camera? oh...why did they let Mr. Ed out of
> retirement? He is a talking HORSE for goodness sakes. Damned Nick at
> Nite.
>
>
> Hahahahaha.
>
>
> karen
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
|