Re: stone or fossil? (incl jpg)

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Paul Myers: "Re: MOST IMPORTANT FOSSIL (A human skull as old as coal!)"
• Previous message: meron@cars3.uchicago.edu: "Re: MOST IMPORTANT FOSSIL (A human skull as old as coal!)"
• Maybe in reply to: Barend Maaskant: "stone or fossil? (incl jpg)"
• Next in thread: karen@uab.edu: "Re: stone or fossil? (incl jpg)"

In article <5602kc$2u3@neptune.worldonline.nl>, maaskant@worldonline.nl
(Barend Maaskant) wrote:

> Hi everyone.
> I have a question.
> On the beach of Domburg (i Holland, near Flushing) I found a remarkable
peace of stone. If it is a stone.
> I just found it between shells on a place where more often fossils are
found: most of them
> are from small sea-animals like the sea urchin.
> I enclose a picture (stones.jpg) UUencoded.
> Can anybody tell from this picture what it is?
> Is it an arrowhead or some fossil?

I'm afraid it doesn't look very remarkable to me. Do you have any reason
other than a rough bilateral symmetry to think it might be unusual?

-- 

Paul Myers                               Department of Biology

myers@netaxs.com                         Temple University

http://fishnet.bio.temple.edu/           Philadelphia, PA 19122

• Next message: Paul Myers: "Re: MOST IMPORTANT FOSSIL (A human skull as old as coal!)"
• Previous message: meron@cars3.uchicago.edu: "Re: MOST IMPORTANT FOSSIL (A human skull as old as coal!)"
• Maybe in reply to: Barend Maaskant: "stone or fossil? (incl jpg)"
• Next in thread: karen@uab.edu: "Re: stone or fossil? (incl jpg)"