|
Re: Crowley posts againJ. Moore (j#d#.moore@canrem.com)Sat, 25 Nov 95 16:23:00 -0500
PC> All this stuff about who said what and when must be very tedious
Anything to get off the subject how your out of context quoting,
PC> a) Phil attacks Elaine - outlining a fairly standard "savannah" theory
Except that Phil didn't "attack" anyone -- he simply explained an
PC> b) Jim quotes Phil
Yes.
PC> c) Paul quotes Jim quoting Phil
That should be "Paul leaves out context of quotes in order to make
PC> d) Alex flames Paul - for demonstrating ignorance
That should be "Alex makes mistake of thinking that Paul
PC> e) Paul refers Alex to Jim's original
Apparently you consider it a flame when someone points out that
PC> g) Phil posts his original original - showing that there was no
And thus Paul ends his attempt at spin-doctoring. Paul, you left out
Jim Moore (j#d#.moore@canrem.com)
* Q-Blue 2.0 *
|