Re: about that ref, please

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Alex Duncan: "complexity"
• Previous message: Paul Crowley: "Re: Alex's gibbon-like CA"
• Maybe in reply to: J. Moore: "about that ref, please"

J. Moore (j#d#.moore@canrem.com) sez:

` > (J. Moore) writes:
` > El> you could have asked me for the page
` > El> references. It would have saved you a lot of time.
` >
` JM> I didn't know it was an option: please post all the complete
` JM> references to all the statements in all your books. Thank you.
` >
Y'know, Jim, when I first saw this, I almost posted a scathing
comment about how you could be such a little snot, making a
comment like that. But I didn't send it, cuz I thought I should
give you the benefit of the doubt that you intended it as
humour. If you're bringing it up again seriously, I can only
say you seem to have no conception of what's reasonable in
this regard.

--

==========================================================================

    vincent@triumf.ca   <== faster       %    Pete Vincent

    vincent@freenet.vancouver.bc.ca      % Disclaimer: all I know I

                                         % learned from reading Usenet.

• Next message: Alex Duncan: "complexity"
• Previous message: Paul Crowley: "Re: Alex's gibbon-like CA"
• Maybe in reply to: J. Moore: "about that ref, please"