Re: Are We Still Evolving?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Phil Nicholls: "Re: Morgan Tears 1"
• Previous message: Gerrit Hanenburg: "Re: From AAT to Wittgenstein? Skip it!"
• Maybe in reply to: Kaushik Banerjee: "Are We Still Evolving?"
• Next in thread: Mike/Damon or Peni R. Griffin: "Re: Are We Still Evolving?"

> The point is that however small, there is
>probably a selective gradient favoring those who simply don't have M3s in
>the first place. In a few thousand years, the human dental formula may
>be 2-1-2-2.
>
Oh boy that means I must be a more evolved individual, except you didn't get
the process quite exactly:

I'm a 2-1-2-3
2-1-1-3

Losing the premolar provides plenty of space for ol' m-3.

Whitey

• Next message: Phil Nicholls: "Re: Morgan Tears 1"
• Previous message: Gerrit Hanenburg: "Re: From AAT to Wittgenstein? Skip it!"
• Maybe in reply to: Kaushik Banerjee: "Are We Still Evolving?"
• Next in thread: Mike/Damon or Peni R. Griffin: "Re: Are We Still Evolving?"