|
Re: Jesus = Lucifer = THE Devililias kastanas 08-14-90 (ikastan@sol.uucp)15 Jul 1996 09:57:49 GMT
In article <4sbiu6$bin$7@mhafn.production.compuserve.com>,
>The christian bible, according to authors Leo Panakal and Vinodh Kumar,
Any relation?
>is nothing less than a malignant fraud that went undetected
As the philosopher Linus Van Pelt put it, "the theological
>The bible comprises the self-expression of Lucifer, the fallen
Well! A voluble and versatile chap, what?
>rebel archangel and devil supreme, who affects himself in it as
He sure held a grudge over losing his job.
>the christian god, a conscious parody of Easwara of the Sanskrit
Actually he _is_ called EWSFOROS in Septuagint Greek.
By the way, wait till you hear my discovery about the Vedas...
>By analytically assessing the actual worth of the bible book, the
Racy, that Song of Songs... it almost cost an R rating. But
>authors free mankind from the fetters of guilt, or sin, instituted
No exclusivity there.
>A cathartic and closely-reasoned work, "The Key to the bible",
Aristotle never made catharsis clear. Now we will know.
>together with its peer "The Judgement on christianity", will leave
Adducing another pile of guilt. Flagellants will roam
>fraud conceived by Lucifer, initiated by jehovah-god, and
The Holy Spirit had the day off?
>finalised by jesus as the alter ego of Lucifer.
Readers of the Grand Inquisitor chapter would give some thought
Now the pieces fall into place. Two-pronged groundwork for the
>--
It would seem then the Deities are really Beelzebub. while
Careful. The Gods on Mount Olympus take a dim view of slander
Ilias
|