Re: AAH

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Sisial@ix.netcom.com: "Re: PROOF OF LIFE AFTER DEATH"
• Previous message: Richard Foy: "Re: AAH"

In article <4sbnm6$5am@kira.cc.uakron.edu>,
david l burkhead <david8@dax.cc.uakron.edu> wrote:
>In article <rfoyDuJsB4.ItF@netcom.com> rfoy@netcom.com (Richard Foy) writes:
>>In article <4s9ltf$sfg@kira.cc.uakron.edu>,
>>david l burkhead <david8@dax.cc.uakron.edu> wrote:
>>>In article <rfoyDuIDwE.7rz@netcom.com> rfoy@netcom.com (Richard Foy) writes:
>>>
>>I admire your skill in posting. It could qualify you to run for
>>public office.
>
> Irrelevant and vague. Nothing more than argument by insinuation.
>Is this the best you can do?

It is the best that this thread deserves.

-- 

"The form is the content in motion, and the content is the form at

rest."  --Northrup Frye


URL http://www.he.tdl.com/~hfanoe/udc.html Unity and Diversity

• Next message: Sisial@ix.netcom.com: "Re: PROOF OF LIFE AFTER DEATH"
• Previous message: Richard Foy: "Re: AAH"