Re: The general warming trend

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Guest1@homer.libby.org: "Re: Apology to Ms. Morgan"
• Previous message: Timo Niroma: "Re: Large animal extinctions"
• Maybe in reply to: Timo Niroma: "The general warming trend"

In article <31E01F79.613B@hydro.on.ca>, Dan Evens <dan.evens@hydro.on.ca>
says:
>
>Timo Niroma wrote:
>> 3. We should not be arguing how much the greenhouse gases really
>>(snips)
>> investigate are the other possible causative agents.
>
>On the contrary, these are EXACTLY the questions we should be asking.
>(snips)
>Mind you, the criticism should be well based. It should rise from
careful
>consideration of well done experiments. It most definately should NOT be
>based on a desire to reduce greenhouse gases, or kill off efforts to
reduce
>greenhouse gases, or any such thing. These are political or economical
or
>prejudicial ideological things. They should NOT intrude into science.
>
>And we should stamp on them whenever we find them.
>(snips)
>Dan Evens

I agree.

I meant that we should not
** SOLELY **
concentrate on those issues.

I meant that we should
** ALSO **
investigate some issues that have not had the place in the
argumentatation they should have deserved.

AND
I am full-heartedly with you in that the issue should be purely
scientific and we should should not mess it with any political or similar
interests.

Regards,
Timo

• Next message: Guest1@homer.libby.org: "Re: Apology to Ms. Morgan"
• Previous message: Timo Niroma: "Re: Large animal extinctions"
• Maybe in reply to: Timo Niroma: "The general warming trend"