|
Re: Bipedalism and theorizing... was Re: Morgan and creationistsPaul Crowley (Paul@crowleyp.demon.co.uk)Sat, 29 Jun 96 11:46:54 GMT
In article <31D1EE3E.6A14@scn.org> bh162@scn.org "Phillip Bigelow" writes:
> (4) Hypotheses without attendant, plausable, testable explainatory
This would rule out most hypotheses about past events. You'd have
It's more commonly a choice between a range of scenarios, for none of
We just have to do our best to keep our feet on the ground and ask
For example: Did early (bipedal) hominid females carry their infants
This is a simple question, for which it's probably impossible to
Paul.
|