Re: A layman's question on bipedalism

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: david l burkhead: "Re: Bipedalism and theorizing... was Re: Morgan and creationists"
• Previous message: HARRY R. ERWIN: "Re: Evolutionary Psychology Newsgroup?"

Right, but again, why seperate out humans? Wouldn't we learn something by
considering what forces favor animal bipedalism in the general case? If
we compare and contrast the various forces behind all bipedalism, wouldn't
we be quite likely to gain insight in to human bipedalism?

Here's a question -- were birds bipedal before they could fly? Bats
aren't bipedal; neither are flying squirrels. Why are birds?

• Next message: david l burkhead: "Re: Bipedalism and theorizing... was Re: Morgan and creationists"
• Previous message: HARRY R. ERWIN: "Re: Evolutionary Psychology Newsgroup?"