Re: prime numbers and African artifact

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Mark Cipra: "Re: AAH update (was: Bipedalism and other factors and AAT)"
• Previous message: Alex Duncan: "Re: Habilis and robusticity notes"
• Maybe in reply to: Jeffrey Shallit: "prime numbers and African artifact"
• Next in thread: @#$%!?!: "Re: prime numbers and African artifact"

jlopez@panix.com (J Lopez) writes:

>In <3tv9dg$fmm@solutions.solon.com> seebs@solutions.solon.com (Peter Seebach) writes:

>>> What's the easy way to show that 254365465431652436514232 is not
>>>prime again

>Sheesh. I can't *believe* you went through all that trouble (and added
>wrong too.) Clearly the number *isn't* prime because it's palindromic.

"no it isn't. the palindrome of 254365465431652436514232 would be
notlob. it don't work! and i'm not prepared to continue with this
as i find it too silly..."

--- courtesy of john cleese

• Next message: Mark Cipra: "Re: AAH update (was: Bipedalism and other factors and AAT)"
• Previous message: Alex Duncan: "Re: Habilis and robusticity notes"
• Maybe in reply to: Jeffrey Shallit: "prime numbers and African artifact"
• Next in thread: @#$%!?!: "Re: prime numbers and African artifact"