Re: aat-reply to Moore.

Ralph L Holloway (rlh2@columbia.edu)
Fri, 7 Jul 1995 21:47:36 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Elaine Morgan: "aat-reply to Moore."
Previous message: Nick Barnes: "Re: prime numbers and African artifact"
Maybe in reply to: Elaine Morgan: "aat-reply to Moore."
Next in thread: David L Burkhead : "Re: aat-reply to Moore."

I repeat my assertion: those paleoanthropologists who have spent their
lives on bipedal locomotion...not Pinker, not Calvin, not E.O. Wilson,
not Dawkins, and I provided a very small list of thoise who do, have a
very hard time taking AAT seriously. Sorry, but there it is. R. Holloway.

Next message: Elaine Morgan: "aat-reply to Moore."
Previous message: Nick Barnes: "Re: prime numbers and African artifact"
Maybe in reply to: Elaine Morgan: "aat-reply to Moore."
Next in thread: David L Burkhead : "Re: aat-reply to Moore."