Re: There are racists; but no races.

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: John A. Halloran: "Re: Human language (long)"
• Previous message: Bob Whitaker: "Re: There are racists; but no races."
• Maybe in reply to: Michael Ballard: "There are racists; but no races."
• Next in thread: Toby Cockcroft: "Re: There are racists; but no races."

Steve Barnard wrote:
>
> Bob Whitaker wrote:
> >
> > Steve Barnard wrote:
> > >
> > > Toby Cockcroft wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 2) What are RACES: what is WHITE and what is BLACK? How can I tell the
> > > > difference between one and the other? Upon what criteria do make these
> > > > distinctions; are these criteria legitimate ones and how come?
> > > >
> > >
> > > I'll bite. How can you tell the difference between "white" and
> > > "black?" What are the legitimate criteria, if any?
> > >
> > > Steve Barnard
> >
> > You clones consistently demand massive third world immigration into and
> > integration in All white majority countries and ONLY white majority.
> > Your "mulitracialism' is alwasy for Oslo, NEVER for Tokyo.
> > You know very well what the w hite race is, you target it perfectly.
>
> Look, you racist bigot. Get this straight. I'm not a fan of faddish
> multiculturism, so don't call me a "clone." I'm sure my politics is
> very different from the PC mainstream that often appears in these
> newsgroups. You, however, are utterly predictable (and contemptible).
>
> Steve Barnard

All PC's claim they're not.

• Next message: John A. Halloran: "Re: Human language (long)"
• Previous message: Bob Whitaker: "Re: There are racists; but no races."
• Maybe in reply to: Michael Ballard: "There are racists; but no races."
• Next in thread: Toby Cockcroft: "Re: There are racists; but no races."