|
|
Re: Human Language. (long post)
Michael McBroom (bodhi@earthlink.net)
Thu, 23 Jan 1997 01:01:40 -0800
John A. Halloran wrote:
>
> In article <19970119182401.NAA06460@ladder01.news.aol.com> mscob@aol.com (MSCob) writes:
>
> >You can't show primitiveness in these languages on
> >linguistic grounds. Furthermore, one hypothesis has Proto-Indo-European
> >as recent as 2000 BC. Mary Coberly
>
> In his book on language evolution and in the two articles to which I referred,
> Bernard H. Bichakjian has shown that Indo-European and its neighboring
> language families have evolved to be more efficient tools for communication
> over the last 6,000 years.
>
> You should read and respond to his articles before making statements such as
> the one above.
You might do well to read and respond to works that are of accepted
worth and validity and quit polluting your mind with stuff from the
lunatic fringe.
Regards,
Michael McBroom
CSUF Linguistics
|