Re: ANCESTRY QUESTION?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Warren Lathe: "Re: ANCESTRY QUESTION?"
• Previous message: NOEL_GIFFIN: "Re: ANCESTRY QUESTION?"
• Maybe in reply to: Greg Resch: "ANCESTRY QUESTION?"
• Next in thread: Warren Lathe: "Re: ANCESTRY QUESTION?"

Seems to me that a special creationist has an asumption that god
created life, before any evidence is examined. Therefore, anything that is
examined by such a person is will be viewed with a bias. However, the same
can be said for someone who has the staunch position of a Darwinist.
As I was taught, to use the methods of science correctly you should
only form an opinion after evidence is found of a conclusive nature.
This would be called fact. Evidence which can't be proven conclusively but
has no apparent contradiction would be called Theory. At best Evolution is
a theory, and special creation something less than that. Anyone from
either camp who will claim to know the truth is certainly less than a
scientist.

• Next message: Warren Lathe: "Re: ANCESTRY QUESTION?"
• Previous message: NOEL_GIFFIN: "Re: ANCESTRY QUESTION?"
• Maybe in reply to: Greg Resch: "ANCESTRY QUESTION?"
• Next in thread: Warren Lathe: "Re: ANCESTRY QUESTION?"