Re: pseudoscience and fossils

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Burt Lo: "Seafood"
• Previous message: Matthew Hill: "RE: Australopith Tools - Was What did AAT Eat"
• Maybe in reply to: Elaine Morgan: "pseudoscience and fossils"
• Next in thread: Scott H Mullins: "Re: pseudoscience and fossils"

Scott H Mullins (smullins@cidmac.ecn.purdue.edu) wrote:
[snip a lot of other stuff]

: The real question that I wanted to ask, Mr. Bigelow, was this:
: is it really necessary that you act like such an ass? Really,
: the attempt to paint the AAT with Velikovskian paint is a weak
: and unctuous rhetorical ploy. You're not a lawyer, are you?

: --
: Scott
: smullins@ecn.purdue.edu

As an observer, and not a player here, I have enjoyed reading the
debates, because they are usually well thought out, and without rancor.
This paragraph fails miserably, Scott, perhaps you should calm down
before responding?

bob c

--

--------Robert Cokel----------

|  Western Illinois University           EMail  RJ-Cokel@bgu.edu

|   Larnin' on the prairie.           Internet  msrjc@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu

|                                              // 

|    Only the Amiga makes it possible!     \\//

|                                             

• Next message: Burt Lo: "Seafood"
• Previous message: Matthew Hill: "RE: Australopith Tools - Was What did AAT Eat"
• Maybe in reply to: Elaine Morgan: "pseudoscience and fossils"
• Next in thread: Scott H Mullins: "Re: pseudoscience and fossils"