Re: Are we "special"?

chessonp@aol.com
6 Dec 1996 14:36:20 GMT

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: chessonp@aol.com: "Re: An alternative to ST and AAT"
Previous message: Jane Andrews: "Re: ED'S HISTORICAL OVERHAUL (Chapter II: Columbus' journey)"
Maybe in reply to: Paul Crowley: "Are we "special"?"
Next in thread: chessonp@aol.com: "Re: Are we "special"?"

In article <01bbe1cb$83a8a960$062470c2@jdwaters.dircon.co.uk>, "John
Waters" <jdwaters@dircon.co.uk> writes:

>However, please notice that I am not saying that humans are
>special in anyway. They are different in many ways. They
>are the only bipedal mammal.

Somehow every once in a while people forget that kangaroos are mamals too.

Next message: chessonp@aol.com: "Re: An alternative to ST and AAT"
Previous message: Jane Andrews: "Re: ED'S HISTORICAL OVERHAUL (Chapter II: Columbus' journey)"
Maybe in reply to: Paul Crowley: "Are we "special"?"
Next in thread: chessonp@aol.com: "Re: Are we "special"?"