Re: Polar Bear Challenge for AAH opponents

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Scott C DeLancey: "Re: The Anthroplogy of th"
• Previous message: Richard Sharpe: "Re: Where are the zoologists?"
• Maybe in reply to: Sir CPU: "Polar Bear Challenge for AAH opponents"
• Next in thread: Phillip Bigelow: "Re: Polar Bear Challenge for AAH opponents"

Pat Dooley <patdooley@delphi.com> writes:

>
>So far as I understand it, the AAH doesn't propose much
>more than wading and a bit of swimming and diving, all
>in reasonable proximity to the sea shore.

Heck, humans and labrador retrievers do that today. Any person who lives
in Malibu or Hilo would qualify as an aquatic ape under your definition.
One problem I see with this debate is a resistence of the Aquatic Ape
supporters to give us "anti-" types a more rigorous definition of what they
mean when they say "aquatic".
<pb>

• Next message: Scott C DeLancey: "Re: The Anthroplogy of th"
• Previous message: Richard Sharpe: "Re: Where are the zoologists?"
• Maybe in reply to: Sir CPU: "Polar Bear Challenge for AAH opponents"
• Next in thread: Phillip Bigelow: "Re: Polar Bear Challenge for AAH opponents"