Re: Where are the zoologists?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: loopy: "Re: Polar Bear Challenge for AAH opponents"
• Previous message: Pete Vincent: "Habilis stooped?"
• Maybe in reply to: Pat Dooley: "Where are the zoologists?"
• Next in thread: Phil Nicholls: "Re: Where are the zoologists?"

In article <3c13kf$dr0@newsbf01.news.aol.com>, patdooley@aol.com (Pat
Dooley) wrote:

>Perhaps the debate could be put
> on a more scientific basis if zoologists had a look at the arguments based
> on comparative physiology and evolutionary biologists exposed some of the
> simple
> errors that have made by both sides in describing evolutionary scenarios.

I don't claim to be an expert {yet :) ! } but I am getting a Ph.D. in
zoology and I also have a background in human paleontology.

I don't know what you think an "evolutionary biologist" is. Most of the
professional scientists and grad students you see posting here are
evolutionary biologists; and I might add, they have been trying to point
out the flaws in the AAH scenario, to little avail.

Lucie

-- 

  |     Lucie M. Melahn

  |     lmm5@cornell.edu

• Next message: loopy: "Re: Polar Bear Challenge for AAH opponents"
• Previous message: Pete Vincent: "Habilis stooped?"
• Maybe in reply to: Pat Dooley: "Where are the zoologists?"
• Next in thread: Phil Nicholls: "Re: Where are the zoologists?"