Re: the Salaciousness of Anthropology

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: John Waters: "Re: Bipedalism and theorizing... was Re: Morgan and creationists"
• Previous message: Timo Niroma: "Curse of Egypt"
• Maybe in reply to: Danny: "the Salaciousness of Anthropology"
• Next in thread: Chuck Stembridge: "Re: the Salaciousness of Anthropology"

Stephen Barnard wrote:
>
> Joel and Lynn Gazis-Sax wrote:
> >
> > Shall we start them out with a description of the lively Australian
> > aboriginal penile enhancement process called "subcism"? :)
> >
>
> Joel,
>
> You seem to be very well informed about this topic. Could you please
> explain what "subcism" is?
>
> (I'm not sure that I want to know.)
>
> Steve Barnard

Well, for one thing, it is /painful/.

-- 

        ___ ___ 

       /\ _|_ /\      Joel and Lynn GAzis-SAx

      / /\_|_/\ \     gazissax@best.com

     / / /\|/\ \ \    http://www.best.com/~gazissax/

 ----------o----------------------------------------------------------

     \ \ \/|\/ / /    "If we try to flee from our human condition into  

      \ \/_|_\/ /     the computer, we only meet ourselves there."

       \/__|__\/                        William Barrett

• Next message: John Waters: "Re: Bipedalism and theorizing... was Re: Morgan and creationists"
• Previous message: Timo Niroma: "Curse of Egypt"
• Maybe in reply to: Danny: "the Salaciousness of Anthropology"
• Next in thread: Chuck Stembridge: "Re: the Salaciousness of Anthropology"