Re: Dissecting the Aquatic Ape: Bipedalism

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Richard Foy: "Re: Morgan and creationists"
• Previous message: Jane Andrews: "Re: Percentage values commonly given for differences in DNA etc, may be meaningless."

In article <31FEE237.5340@mindspring.com>,
Leonard Timmons <ltimmons@mindspring.com> wrote:
>
>
>Anyway, since this is really (hopefully informed) speculation, I am just looking
>for someone to tell me if this sequence has any major flaws in it. Or does it
>hold together fairly well as an event that could cause the rise of mankind.
>

This speculation seems to me to be as logical is the one that says
our ancestors stood up to be able to see leopords at a greater
distance. However FWIW, I am not an anthopologist.

-- 

Western Kundali; Chakra 1 awakening,

	"Greed is good." -- Michael Douglas in Wall Street

 

URL http://www.he.tdl.com/~hfanoe/index.html 

• Next message: Richard Foy: "Re: Morgan and creationists"
• Previous message: Jane Andrews: "Re: Percentage values commonly given for differences in DNA etc, may be meaningless."