Re: : humanities, 3rd culture, reflexive admissions...

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Richard Spear: "Re: Is anthropology science?"
• Previous message: Anne M. Jensen: "Re: Women and fieldwork"

On Sep 6, Ruby Rohrlich wrote:

> ... read any of the feminist
>critiques which demonstrate that masculinist and misogynistic concepts
>contaminate the kind of research scientists choose to do...

Does her usage imply "masculinist" is the opposite of "feminist"?
If so, does such opposite require opposition? Further, with the
current fragmentation in "feminism", would this mean there is
like fragmentation in masculinism if it is merely defined as a
derivative word?

• Next message: Richard Spear: "Re: Is anthropology science?"
• Previous message: Anne M. Jensen: "Re: Women and fieldwork"