anthro as "odd-ball" science

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Kim Stout: "Re: anthro as "odd-ball" science"
• Previous message: Ruby Rohrlich: "Re: Re.: Review of Geertz"

I don't know about the rest of you,but when I tell people that I'm an anthropol
ogist their response it to ask me if I've been on any good digs lately. It gets
worse if I specify that I'm an aesthetic anthropologist! (been on any "pretty"
digs lately?) Best Regards, Lynn

• Next message: Kim Stout: "Re: anthro as "odd-ball" science"
• Previous message: Ruby Rohrlich: "Re: Re.: Review of Geertz"