Re: Evolution as fact

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Michael Cahill: "Re: titles and archaeology <long>"
• Previous message: Danny Yee: "Re: USENET posts that haunt you foreve"

Stuff this definitional nonsense about facts and theories; some
explanations just work better than others. I will accept that this
ridiculous bill isn't a bare-faced attempt to limit how much students
are expose to evolution if they also pass a law making it illegal to
teach that Jesus existed without explaining that this is no more than
a historical hypothesis. (And one with far, far less supporting
evidence than evolution.)

Danny Yee (who doesn't actually doubt that Jesus did exist, but who
has serious doubts about Moses).

• Next message: Michael Cahill: "Re: titles and archaeology <long>"
• Previous message: Danny Yee: "Re: USENET posts that haunt you foreve"