Re: Ka xiik teech utzil

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Peter D. Junger: "Re: FW: Religous Variation"
• Previous message: Edward W. Farrell: "Re: Religious Variation [Was " Biological = trivial?"]"

On Tue, 30 Jul 1996, Iain Walker wrote:

> > >Ka xiik teech utzil,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >John Pastore
>
> Did he even tell anyone what this means?

Sorry, a typo. I meant to write "Did he _ever_ tell anyone what this
means?" (It's important to me).

Iain Walker * Dept. of Anthropology * University of Sydney
iainw@sue.econ.su.oz.au * ngazidja@jolt.mpx.com.au

"L'homme qui a deux femmes perd son ame;
"L'homme qui a deux maisons perd sa raison"
or
"mdru ukana hahe na ha nduhuze"

• Next message: Peter D. Junger: "Re: FW: Religous Variation"
• Previous message: Edward W. Farrell: "Re: Religious Variation [Was " Biological = trivial?"]"