Re: Ka xiik teech utzil

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Edward W. Farrell: "Re: Religious Variation [Was " Biological = trivial?"]"
• Previous message: mike shupp: "Re: Religious Variation [Was " Biological = trivial?"]"

> >Ka xiik teech utzil,
> >
> >
> >
> >John Pastore

Did he even tell anyone what this means?

Iain Walker * Dept. of Anthropology * University of Sydney
iainw@sue.econ.su.oz.au * ngazidja@jolt.mpx.com.au

"L'homme qui a deux femmes perd son ame;
"L'homme qui a deux maisons perd sa raison"
or
"mdru ukana hahe na ha nduhuze"

• Next message: Edward W. Farrell: "Re: Religious Variation [Was " Biological = trivial?"]"
• Previous message: mike shupp: "Re: Religious Variation [Was " Biological = trivial?"]"