Re: watchdog.

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Ruby Rohrlich: "Re: Watchhounds"
• Previous message: K. Zielinski: "Re: Watchhounds"

> Migwad Ralph, you miss-interperted the whole affair
>
> Josephine
>
> > Migawd. The humor, the erudition! This is clearly the list to be on!
> > Anyone ready for "rugged individualism" yet?
> > Ralph Holloway
> >
>
And I was trying to reply off-list to Robert Lawless [do you have a
workable address?]: And so "nothing but a hound dog" would mean...?
But taking Ralph's direction: So, after all of these postings, is J.
Rifkin a watchdog or not?

D. J. Cattle

• Next message: Ruby Rohrlich: "Re: Watchhounds"
• Previous message: K. Zielinski: "Re: Watchhounds"